Compare Models
Evaluate leading AI models side-by-side. Compare context windows, open-weights licensing, parameters, and verified benchmarks to choose the right model for your application.
Comparing 1 of 4 models
Compare Agent & Coding Benchmarks
Visualize side-by-side relative performance differences for selected models on core coding benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-GGUF—
Dynamic Running Cost Estimator
Estimate query costs based on the model pricing database and your expected volume.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-GGUFFree (Self-Hosted)
Not all models have been independently verified yet. Benchmark scores display exact field confidence (VERIFIED / LIKELY / DRAFT). Uncorroborated benchmarks show Pending Curator Audit.
Model Comparison Matrix
Add a model | Add a model | Add a model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open Weights | |||
| License | MIT | |||
| Parameters | 284B parameters | |||
| Modalities | text | |||
| Context Window | 1MLargest | |||
| Estimated cost / query | FreeCheapest | |||
| SWE-Bench Score | — (Pending Audit) | |||
| Aider Polyglot | — (Pending Audit) | |||
| GPQA Diamond | — (Pending Audit) | |||
| Agents' Last Exam | 25.2%Verified | |||
| AutomationBench | 25.1%Verified | |||
| Cybergym | 76.7%Verified | |||
| DSBench-Hard t | 59.6%Verified | |||
| DeepSWE | 54.4%Verified | |||
| NL2Repo | 54.2%Verified | |||
| Public DSBench-FullStack † | 68.7%Verified | |||
| Terminal Bench 2.1 | 82.7%Verified | |||
| Toolathlon-Verified | 70.3%Verified |